Categories in this e-Portfolio are based around the INTASC Standards
for beginning teachers.
  • Philosophy
  • Subject Matter Knowledge
  • Child Development
  • Diversity of Learners
  • Instructional Strategies
  • Learning Environment
  • Communication
  • Planning Instruction
  • Assessment
  • Technology
  • Personal Reflection & Professional Development
  • Community Involvement


  • Home
  • Resumé
  • Contact

Philosophy of Music Education


Case's Teacher Licensure program seeks to develop Proactive Scholar-Practitioners. I think that this is a great way to dissect what it is that effective teachers are able to do.

Effective teachers are proactive. In contrast to reactive teachers, effective teachers are able to plan ahead to use their classroom time most efficiently. They work hard to seek out opportunities to improve themselves and their methods. They are able to stop problems before they start, and seize opportunities for enhanced learning from their first sparks of existence. Although effective teachers are not reactive, they do take part in the proactive process of reflection, to best analyze their progress and determine how to best tailor their instruction to contextual needs.

Effective teachers are scholars. Never content with their own education, they remain active learners in their fields. They ask questions, perform research, remain appraised of the literature in their field, and reflect on their findings.

Effective teachers are master practitioners. They are able to take their knowledge of their subject and of educational pedagogy and effectively implement it in a classroom setting. They are able to effectively communicate with students, and help those students grow intellectually and personally.

In my view, the centerpiece of a proactive scholar-practitioner's preparation is her teaching philosophy. It is upon her philosophy that each teacher bases her decisions of what to teach in her classroom. This includes curricular choices, method choices, classroom management choices, and even organizational or administrative choices.

I wrote my first philosophy of music education in the fall of 2002, and that document is included at the bottom of this page. While most of my core beliefs have remained the same since that time, I believe that I have gained greater depth of my understanding of what it means to lead a music classroom, and a greater level of specificity for my values.

I predict that my philosophy as a teacher will continue to progress in this way - while my core beliefs regarding what is valuable about music education are likely to remain the same, I will continue to broaden and deepen the scope of those beliefs, refining them with more experience, as well as letting them guide my experience.

Philosophy Artifacts


Erin's First Philosophy (PDF File)
This is the first philosophy of music education I wrote, for my Introduction to Music Education course taken in the fall of 2002. A lot has changed since then, but I am including it to show the development of my thoughts as a music educator over time.


Philosophy of Music Education (PDF File)
Written in the Fall of 2006 as a final project for my Philosophy of Music Education class at Case Western, this paper outlines some of my most important values in the teaching of music. I found it difficult to express all the thoughts I have on music education and its importance in only six pages, but I am proud of the philosophy I came up with. It gets to the heart of most of my core beliefs while allowing room for further growth.


Philosophical Questions about Choral Education (Link to Webpage)
In this blog post for my Choral Methods class taken in Spring 2007 at Case Western, I reflect upon a chapter in Ken Phillip's book Developing the Choral Program in which he discusses philosophical justifications for a choral music program. In this post, I engage in an activity in which I select several reasons that I believe choral education is important and reflect upon these ideas.




© 2008, Erin M. Grady
All rights reserved.